Zohran Mamdani Draws Criticism After Appointing Ramzi Kassem as New York City Chief Counsel

New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has faced swift political backlash following his announcement that legal scholar Ramzi Kassem will serve as the city’s next Chief Counsel. The appointment, revealed on December 31, has drawn sharp criticism from conservative groups and some political figures, while supporters argue the reaction reflects broader ideological divisions rather than concerns over professional qualifications.

The Chief Counsel position is among the most influential legal roles in New York City government, overseeing litigation, advising the mayor, and shaping the city’s legal strategy. Mamdani’s decision has therefore attracted heightened scrutiny, particularly as legal appointments have become increasingly politicized in recent years.

Kassem is a law professor at the City University of New York and has previously advised the federal government on immigration-related issues. Over the course of his career, he has represented detainees and immigrants, as well as clients involved in controversial cases. Critics have focused on this past legal work, arguing that it raises questions about his suitability for a senior city role. Supporters counter that providing legal defense is a fundamental principle of the justice system and does not imply endorsement of a client’s actions.

Additional criticism emerged after earlier writings and activism associated with Kassem resurfaced online. Some commentators pointed to his past commentary on Middle East issues and campus activism as evidence of what they describe as extreme views. Others, including civil rights advocates, said those claims misrepresent his record and remove statements from their original context.

The appointment has prompted calls from some lawmakers for closer review, while others have defended Mamdani’s decision as fair and consistent with democratic values. Advocacy organizations focused on civil liberties and immigration rights praised the selection, saying it reflects a commitment to protecting vulnerable communities and upholding constitutional principles.

Political analysts say the controversy could shape the early narrative surrounding Mamdani’s administration. Supporters see the appointment as a signal of a more progressive legal approach at City Hall, while critics warn it may invite sustained political pressure and heightened media attention.

The debate also reflects a broader national conversation about legal advocacy, political identity, and the role of past writings in evaluating public officials. Despite the criticism, Mamdani has stood by his decision, stating that New York City requires strong and principled legal leadership as his administration prepares to take office.